SecondGM
Loading your leagues…
20 Sept, 18:00 BST
Reliant Stadium
The Bengals’ aerial matchup offers upside, while Houston’s lead back must navigate a firm run defense.
Joe Burrow faces a defense that has allowed 334 passing yards and 0.56 EPA per dropback to opposing quarterbacks, a far friendlier setting than his own -0.07 EPA per play opener.
C.J. Stroud faces a defense that has allowed -0.29 EPA per dropback and no passing touchdowns to opposing quarterbacks. C.J. Stroud also faces a defense with an 11.11% sack rate against opposing quarterbacks.
David Montgomery handled 20 carries and a 68.97% carry share, yet David Montgomery faces a defense that has allowed just 60 rushing yards to opposing running backs.
Joe Burrow attempted 35 passes and posted a 71.43% completion rate in the opener, but Joe Burrow’s 249.5-yard passing line asks him to take advantage of Houston’s permissive early returns. Joe Burrow faces a defense that has allowed 334 passing yards to opposing quarterbacks, while Joe Burrow faces a defense with a 6.25% sack rate against opposing quarterbacks. The pressure point is turning efficient completions into more productive drives.
Tee Higgins accounted for 51.77% of Cincinnati’s air yards on a 17.65% target share, and Tee Higgins carries a 55.5-yard receiving line. Mike Gesicki drew a 20.59% target share and produced 4.59 yards per route run. Mike Gesicki faces a defense that has allowed 137 receiving yards to opposing tight ends, although Mike Gesicki’s 25-yard receiving line remains modest.
Nico Collins commanded a 27.03% target share and 37.27% of Houston’s air yards, while Nico Collins generated 2.03 yards per route run. C.J. Stroud attempted 38 passes with an average of 7.82 intended air yards per throw, so Houston showed willingness to push the ball beyond short throws. But C.J. Stroud faces a defense that has allowed -0.29 EPA per dropback, making sustained efficiency the central question.
AI analysis of the player usage, efficiency and matchup data available before kickoff. Early-season samples are limited; missing data is not treated as zero. This preview remains separate from the postgame review.
Data checked 19 Sept 2026, 12:40 UK time. Individual sources can update at different times.
20 Sept, 18:00 BST
Reliant Stadium
The Bengals’ aerial matchup offers upside, while Houston’s lead back must navigate a firm run defense.
Joe Burrow faces a defense that has allowed 334 passing yards and 0.56 EPA per dropback to opposing quarterbacks, a far friendlier setting than his own -0.07 EPA per play opener.
C.J. Stroud faces a defense that has allowed -0.29 EPA per dropback and no passing touchdowns to opposing quarterbacks. C.J. Stroud also faces a defense with an 11.11% sack rate against opposing quarterbacks.
David Montgomery handled 20 carries and a 68.97% carry share, yet David Montgomery faces a defense that has allowed just 60 rushing yards to opposing running backs.
Joe Burrow attempted 35 passes and posted a 71.43% completion rate in the opener, but Joe Burrow’s 249.5-yard passing line asks him to take advantage of Houston’s permissive early returns. Joe Burrow faces a defense that has allowed 334 passing yards to opposing quarterbacks, while Joe Burrow faces a defense with a 6.25% sack rate against opposing quarterbacks. The pressure point is turning efficient completions into more productive drives.
Tee Higgins accounted for 51.77% of Cincinnati’s air yards on a 17.65% target share, and Tee Higgins carries a 55.5-yard receiving line. Mike Gesicki drew a 20.59% target share and produced 4.59 yards per route run. Mike Gesicki faces a defense that has allowed 137 receiving yards to opposing tight ends, although Mike Gesicki’s 25-yard receiving line remains modest.
Nico Collins commanded a 27.03% target share and 37.27% of Houston’s air yards, while Nico Collins generated 2.03 yards per route run. C.J. Stroud attempted 38 passes with an average of 7.82 intended air yards per throw, so Houston showed willingness to push the ball beyond short throws. But C.J. Stroud faces a defense that has allowed -0.29 EPA per dropback, making sustained efficiency the central question.
AI analysis of the player usage, efficiency and matchup data available before kickoff. Early-season samples are limited; missing data is not treated as zero. This preview remains separate from the postgame review.
Data checked 19 Sept 2026, 12:40 UK time. Individual sources can update at different times.
David Montgomery played 49% of the offensive snaps but received 20 carries, including 3 goal-line carries. Woody Marks played 51% of the offensive snaps and took 9 carries, so the snap split has not prevented David Montgomery from owning the higher-value rushing work. David Montgomery’s 63.5-yard rushing line is difficult to separate from a 3-yard-per-carry opener and Cincinnati’s 60 rushing yards allowed to opposing running backs.
David Montgomery played 49% of the offensive snaps but received 20 carries, including 3 goal-line carries. Woody Marks played 51% of the offensive snaps and took 9 carries, so the snap split has not prevented David Montgomery from owning the higher-value rushing work. David Montgomery’s 63.5-yard rushing line is difficult to separate from a 3-yard-per-carry opener and Cincinnati’s 60 rushing yards allowed to opposing running backs.