SecondGM
Loading your leagues…
20 Sept, 18:00 BST
Soldier Field
Newer statistics are in the Lab. The published game review is unchanged. Explore latest stats →
Minnesota rode Aaron Jones and a suffocating defensive effort, while Chicago’s volume never became usable production.
This game · verified box score
Explore the game dataMIN D/ST supplied the game’s defining fantasy result, repeatedly disrupting Chicago’s quarterbacks and protecting a narrow victory. The Bears reached more yardage but could not convert possessions into points, leaving Minnesota’s defense as the most reliable unit on either roster.
Jones supplied the only sustained rushing production, handling a commanding workload and clearing the century mark without needing a touchdown. His limited route participation keeps the receiving ceiling uncertain, but this was an emphatic early-down role.
Carson Wentz managed the game rather than driving a passing eruption, completing 11 passes for 143 passing yards without a passing touchdown. He added 3 carries for 6 rushing yards, while taking 3 sacks. Caleb Williams had more movement value, with 5 carries for 42 rushing yards, but his passing line stalled at 15 completions for 138 passing yards, no passing touchdowns and 1 passing interception. Tyson Bagent’s relief work was similarly limited: 5 completions for 54 passing yards across 9 attempts. Neither quarterback room produced a secure fantasy starter from this contest.
20 Sept, 18:00 BST
Soldier Field
Newer statistics are in the Lab. The published game review is unchanged. Explore latest stats →
Minnesota rode Aaron Jones and a suffocating defensive effort, while Chicago’s volume never became usable production.
This game · verified box score
Explore the game dataMIN D/ST supplied the game’s defining fantasy result, repeatedly disrupting Chicago’s quarterbacks and protecting a narrow victory. The Bears reached more yardage but could not convert possessions into points, leaving Minnesota’s defense as the most reliable unit on either roster.
Jones supplied the only sustained rushing production, handling a commanding workload and clearing the century mark without needing a touchdown. His limited route participation keeps the receiving ceiling uncertain, but this was an emphatic early-down role.
Carson Wentz managed the game rather than driving a passing eruption, completing 11 passes for 143 passing yards without a passing touchdown. He added 3 carries for 6 rushing yards, while taking 3 sacks. Caleb Williams had more movement value, with 5 carries for 42 rushing yards, but his passing line stalled at 15 completions for 138 passing yards, no passing touchdowns and 1 passing interception. Tyson Bagent’s relief work was similarly limited: 5 completions for 54 passing yards across 9 attempts. Neither quarterback room produced a secure fantasy starter from this contest.
D’Andre Swift led Chicago in touches and receiving work, but Kyle Monangai was materially involved and more efficient on the ground. Swift’s receiving role preserved a PPR contribution; the lost fumble remains the costly blemish in a low-scoring environment.
Expected points describe the value of the opportunities received. Both figures use full-PPR scoring.
Minnesota trusted Aaron Jones with 23 carries for 105 rushing yards, a 4.57 yards-per-carry result that accounted for the clearest offensive advantage in the game. Jones was on the field for 81% of offensive snaps, but ran only 10 routes and saw no targets, so the workload was firmly ground-based. DeeJay Dallas played a minor complementary role with 2 carries for 8 rushing yards and 1 reception for 12 receiving yards. Demond Claiborne added 1 reception for 2 receiving yards, while Max Bredeson’s 17 offensive snaps came with no targets. The hierarchy was unmistakable even if the passing-game involvement was not.
Justin Jefferson led Minnesota’s passing-game opportunity with 6 targets and 91 receiving air yards, converting 3 receptions for 55 receiving yards. Jordan Addison drew 5 targets but finished with 2 receptions for 21 receiving yards. T.J. Hockenson gave Wentz a useful middle-of-field option, producing 3 receptions for 29 receiving yards on 4 targets. Josh Oliver made his lone target count for 1 reception and 24 receiving yards, though he ran only 4 routes. Myles Price ran 19 routes and saw 1 target without a reception, a reminder that the peripheral receiver usage was not yet fantasy actionable.
Verified route counts. Route volume alone does not establish a future role.
Luther Burden III owned Chicago’s most aggressive opportunity profile, taking 7 targets and 87 receiving air yards, but he turned that into only 3 receptions for 32 receiving yards. Rome Odunze was the most productive Bears wideout, recording 3 receptions for 43 receiving yards on 4 targets across 38 routes. Kalif Raymond provided a useful underneath outlet with 5 receptions for 40 receiving yards, while running 32 routes. The tight ends were heavily involved in snap terms but not results: Colston Loveland ran 29 routes for 1 reception and 3 receiving yards, Cole Kmet ran 13 routes for 1 target, and Sam Roush had 3 targets but only 1 reception for 9 receiving yards. That route and target distribution offers opportunity context, but the offense did not manufacture a difference-maker.
Will Reichard supplied all of Minnesota’s scoring with 3 field goals on 3 field-goal attempts, including a 49-yard field-goal long. Cairo Santos made 1 field goal on 2 field-goal attempts, with 1 blocked field goal. Chicago D/ST did create pressure with 3 sacks and held Minnesota to 9 score allowed, but MIN D/ST was more complete: 4 sacks, 1 interception, 1 opponent fumble recovery and 3 score allowed. For Chicago’s ancillary roles, Roschon Johnson played 1 offensive snap, while Jahdae Walker ran 4 routes without a target; neither showed a current offensive path worth projecting from this game alone.
Game-only statistics. Receiving PPR per route uses receiving production only. Week 1 observations are not established season trends. Missing data is kept separate from zero.
Statistics checked 23/09/2026. Reports and the Lab use the same published evidence edition.
D’Andre Swift led Chicago in touches and receiving work, but Kyle Monangai was materially involved and more efficient on the ground. Swift’s receiving role preserved a PPR contribution; the lost fumble remains the costly blemish in a low-scoring environment.
Expected points describe the value of the opportunities received. Both figures use full-PPR scoring.
Minnesota trusted Aaron Jones with 23 carries for 105 rushing yards, a 4.57 yards-per-carry result that accounted for the clearest offensive advantage in the game. Jones was on the field for 81% of offensive snaps, but ran only 10 routes and saw no targets, so the workload was firmly ground-based. DeeJay Dallas played a minor complementary role with 2 carries for 8 rushing yards and 1 reception for 12 receiving yards. Demond Claiborne added 1 reception for 2 receiving yards, while Max Bredeson’s 17 offensive snaps came with no targets. The hierarchy was unmistakable even if the passing-game involvement was not.
Justin Jefferson led Minnesota’s passing-game opportunity with 6 targets and 91 receiving air yards, converting 3 receptions for 55 receiving yards. Jordan Addison drew 5 targets but finished with 2 receptions for 21 receiving yards. T.J. Hockenson gave Wentz a useful middle-of-field option, producing 3 receptions for 29 receiving yards on 4 targets. Josh Oliver made his lone target count for 1 reception and 24 receiving yards, though he ran only 4 routes. Myles Price ran 19 routes and saw 1 target without a reception, a reminder that the peripheral receiver usage was not yet fantasy actionable.
Verified route counts. Route volume alone does not establish a future role.
Luther Burden III owned Chicago’s most aggressive opportunity profile, taking 7 targets and 87 receiving air yards, but he turned that into only 3 receptions for 32 receiving yards. Rome Odunze was the most productive Bears wideout, recording 3 receptions for 43 receiving yards on 4 targets across 38 routes. Kalif Raymond provided a useful underneath outlet with 5 receptions for 40 receiving yards, while running 32 routes. The tight ends were heavily involved in snap terms but not results: Colston Loveland ran 29 routes for 1 reception and 3 receiving yards, Cole Kmet ran 13 routes for 1 target, and Sam Roush had 3 targets but only 1 reception for 9 receiving yards. That route and target distribution offers opportunity context, but the offense did not manufacture a difference-maker.
Will Reichard supplied all of Minnesota’s scoring with 3 field goals on 3 field-goal attempts, including a 49-yard field-goal long. Cairo Santos made 1 field goal on 2 field-goal attempts, with 1 blocked field goal. Chicago D/ST did create pressure with 3 sacks and held Minnesota to 9 score allowed, but MIN D/ST was more complete: 4 sacks, 1 interception, 1 opponent fumble recovery and 3 score allowed. For Chicago’s ancillary roles, Roschon Johnson played 1 offensive snap, while Jahdae Walker ran 4 routes without a target; neither showed a current offensive path worth projecting from this game alone.
Game-only statistics. Receiving PPR per route uses receiving production only. Week 1 observations are not established season trends. Missing data is kept separate from zero.
Statistics checked 23/09/2026. Reports and the Lab use the same published evidence edition.